Most commercial organizations use
pumping equipment of one sort or another. Pumps are thought to be the most common machines in existence second only to levers.
Where pumps and valves are installed, there is obviously an unavoidable
reason for them being there. Unlike some other electrical and mechanical devices, pumps and some valves require
specialist knowledge to design systems and select the most appropriate equipment.
When all of the pumps and valves on a site are viewed as one large energy-consuming machine it makes sense to pay
a great deal of attention to ensure that your pumps and hydraulic systems are designed to achieve optimum efficiency and lowest
whole life cost
A major factor today is the whole life
operating costs, this must be studied in depth taking into account capital cost, time to maintainence, time to failure, cost
of service parts, cost of down time, labour costs, loss of efficiency and the very real issue of disposal costs of materials
and lubricants
Our analysis will evaluate which
pumps are protected by duty / standby arrangements, which pumps can be repaired with an acceptable down time and which are
the critical pumps that should be kept as replacements.
As
an example of how this affects your business we can use a simple pump project installed to lift waste-water a total height
of 10M over a distance of 320M at a rate of 20 litres per second. We used a major pump manufacturers actual selection
software for the following examples
Example A) a main
contractor with little knowledge may result in the wrong pumps being installed. To save capital costs a run of pipework
is installed using 100mm bore. The calculated duty point for this system is 20L/s @ 30M. The pump selected is a 20Kw machine
with a pump efficiency of less than 40%.
Example B) Our advice
is to use 150mm pipework and selecting a pump with at least 60% efficiency. The calculated duty point for our system would
be 20L/s @ 15.6M. The pump selected is a 6Kw machine with an efficiency of 64%
The result of this taking into account a typical usage of 14% pa and energy at £0.05 per unit is: -
Example A Power at duty point 15.9Kw cost pa £1112.00, power pa 19499Kwh
Example B Power at duty point 4.7Kw cost pa £483.00, power
pa 5764Kwh
The environmental impact
is 13735Kwh power saved and a running cost difference of £629.00 pa. The price
of a 6Kw pump is obviously significantly lower than a 20Kw machine as are the spares. There are also fewer
raw materials used in manufacturing the pump
A very common application for Larox Pinch Valves is in pneumatic conveying
systems for example in a fly ash or bottom ash conveying
We recently had an enquiry from a UK power generating
station that uses chicken manure to fuel the boilers. The system has a pneumatic conveying system to transfer spent ash
This type of system uses a storage vessel called a blow pot, the ash is dropped into the blow pot which then seals
using a shut off valve. The system is pressurized then another valve opens and the product is transferred
This
company are using valves which require overhaul every two weeks, the parts cost around £90 per valve, it takes around
three hours to do the overhaul, they have lost production of three hours and the mean time between failure is ten days
To replace the complete valves using Larox Flowsys Pinch Valves had a capital cost of £5000.00
per valve
I agree with your gut reaction, this is very expensive and there is no point even considering changing
HOWEVER
Over five years, the existing system costs
£65,700.00 to own and there is 730 hours of lost production
Over the same period the Larox Pinch Valves
cost £17,316.00 to own and the lost production is 30 hours. Ignoring the cost of lost production, this is a cost saving
of £48,384.00 over five years or £12,000 + per year every year the system is in service